Gender Identification Differences Observed For DNA Quantification versus STR Genotyping of Mummified Human Remains-How it Relates to Human Identifications in Forensic Science.

Kate M. Reidy, Amanda Gareis, Dahong Sun, Richard AuClair, Tracey Wong, Rachel Lang, Haiying Meng, Heather Miller Coyle, Henry C. Lee, Albert B. Harper

Abstract


DNA testing of human remains is an important identification technology, especially after major mass disasters.  It is particularly useful for cases where the remains are highly fragmented such as in bombings and explosions of airplanes and buildings.  Bone and tissue in these disaster circumstances can be exposed to high heat and extreme drying conditions, analogous to what is observed in mummified remains.  Bone and tissue from mummified human remains found in a subterranean cave in the Gobi Desert in Mongolia were donated to the Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science to determine the gender of the samples using traditional forensic DNA methods.  The goals of this project were to (1) determine if DNA could be recovered, (2) quantify the recovered DNA and (3) determine if genotyping was possible.  Human DNA was obtained from these samples and evaluated using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System.  The results showed that quantifiable amounts of both total human and male-specific human DNA were present.  When these samples were genotyped, some differences between the Real-Time PCR system and the Minifiler genotyping system were observed.  An explanation for these observations and the potential value for using two different gender identification genes (AMEL and SRY) with highly degraded bone and tissue samples will be presented.


Keywords


DNA, Minifiler, Quantifiler, bone, tissue, gender identification

Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  

ISSN 1942-7794

$